Profil de ToonfactoryCartoonist Alok's WorldPhotosBlogListesPlus Outils Aide

Blog


22/11/2005

Taj Mahal:The True Story

Real History of "Taj Mahal"

It is proved Taj Mahal is not a burial of Mumtaj but an ancient temple of Lord Shiva. Sufficient proofs and website links are with this Blog.

U can try this link (text and photo) before/after going through this:

www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm
"The Moghul Emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal built the Taj Mahal. It was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653) by 20,000 artisans brought to India from all over the world! . Many people believe Ustad Isa of Iran designed it." This is what your guide probably told you if you ever visited the Taj Mahal. This is the same story I read in my history book as a student.


NOW READ THIS.......

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the
building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace.

 

Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York
took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple
rather than a mausoleum.


Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples. Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences.

There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

 

If u don't believe the article above, and have faith upon BBC, please visit their website in this link:


www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A5220

Commentaires (7)

Veuillez patienter...
Le commentaire entré est trop long. Raccourcissez-le.
Vous n'avez rien entré. Réessayez.
Il est actuellement impossible d'ajouter votre commentaire. Réessayez plus tard.
Pour ajouter un commentaire, tu dois avoir l'autorisation de tes parents. Demander l'autorisation
Tes parents ont désactivé les commentaires.
Il est actuellement impossible de supprimer votre commentaire. Réessayez plus tard.
Vous avez dépassé le nombre maximal de commentaires qu'il est possible d'envoyer le même jour. Réessayez dans 24 heures.
Votre compte a pu laisser les commentaires désactivés parce que nos systèmes indiquent que vous risquez d'arroser d'autres utilisateurs de messages. Si vous pensez que votre compte a été désactivé par erreur, contactez l'assistance en ligne de Windows Live.
Effectuez la vérification de sécurité ci-dessous pour finaliser l'envoi de votre commentaire.
Les caractères entrés pour la vérification de sécurité doivent correspondre à ceux de l'image ou du fichier audio.

Pour ajouter un commentaire, connectez-vous avec votre identifiant Windows Live ID (si vous utilisez Messenger ou Xbox LIVE, vous avez un identifiant Windows Live ID). Connectez-vous


Vous n'avez pas d'identifiant Windows Live ID ? Inscrivez-vous

Image de Anonyme
lola a écrit :
Absolutely! Why else would you think I left my comment here. I sure like the information you share. Well, just had an after thot. Taj and the Great Wall of China(check the All under Heaven blog on mine).. both, one among the old seven wonders... and both have a not-so-popular kinda story to carry..... I wonder what the other wonders have burried underneath. ;) (just a thot) :)
26 Nov.
Image de Anonyme
ChoosingShari a écrit :
REAlly? You think my space is one of the best you have seen?! AAAwwww...you are making me blush, Aaloo! ( Sorry, I called you Aaloo...giggle, snurk!). Wow, THanks for the offer(visit) but I am too shy a person to actually respond to such a kind gesture. I think I shall simply subscribe to Gotham comics instead of waiting for the magazine vendor to order them...but not till my exams are over...then I can hike my allowance rate and subscribe it myself....Dad doesnt like comics, he thinks it's childish....but I beg to differ, after all that is the one thing that reminds me of my childhood...I ain giving up for anyone's sake.
My Favourite comic has to be two : 1. Wolverine (I tend to have a crush on him now and then...coz he's so cooool and sort of a Clint Eastwood on paper) & 2. Uncanny Xmen (coz they are one of the few that exhibit emotions alongside basic ass-kicking fun). This is becomming too much of a Puraana than a comment. Why dont you feed in a little about your work experience and ofcourse the myth of Comics being Childish...I think they can be universally accepted.
I thought it over again....Not because you work at Gotham but simply coz you are a cool guy, Wanna be your e-pal. My email is - http://www.shanote@msn.com
Keep blogging, Aaloo...sheeesh! Sorry!
25 Nov.
Image de Anonyme
ChoosingShari a écrit :
Oh God! You work for GOTHAM comics!!!!AHHHH(screaming)!!! Mwah, kisses, kisses, kisses!!!
I LOOOOOOOOVVVVEEEE Gotham Comics! I love to read DC/ Marvel all the time...esp. Avengers, Uncanny Xmen (fav), Superman, THe Amazing Spiderman, Fantastic 4, Wolverine( fav), Nightcrawler...I have a sensible collection coz I didnt wanna give it away. I first started out by buying them to my teenaged cousin who loves them then I thought of keeping them to myself after lending them to him. I used to be a regular reader back in Bombay where i used to stay. But now, here it's irregular as the shopkeeper doesnt order them as much. I miss it...especially the newer editions. Sob!
You are god to me! Bye!
25 Nov.
Image de Anonyme
lola a écrit :
If what Oak says is true, it has been the same then and now.. may be will always be. Bitter truths always masked and deflected with a different story as far as high class, level or aristocratic population is concerned. Nobody is different from anybody else and nothing is chance or character. power and control is what rules the earth and as long as you have a mass to follow anything can be fabricated. Sad.. I prefer my fairy tales a lot better now but probably they are too idealistic to be true!!!

Thanks, somehow this doesn't get in as a shock.
25 Nov.
Image de Anonyme
MajesticBlushingBriton a écrit :
Noooooooo.........not another Ayodhya in the making. But seriously if this is to be believed, it will a lot of controversy & u know what happens in our country, when hindus call a place theirs.

Whatever be the case, I think the monument is indeed a master peice & it should remain as a pride with us & not a place for which another hindu muslim riots occur.............it could be unture also, coz sumone who may not be wanting Taj to remain the wonder of the world maybe creating such doubts, but then who know, anything is possible.

How u doing buddy??? I m having a terrible cervical pain for the past 3 days & I m barred from using the puter, so just a sneak peak in2 the cartoonists world, hey how bout a caricature of Taj as a temple?? No???? I think we better leave it there.

BTW u've been tagged ;-)

Cheers
24 Nov.
Image de Anonyme
ChoosingShari a écrit :
My high school teacher told us about the Taj Mahal Controversy, we didnt believe it then. But he said that a guy wrote a book on it that The Taj Mahal as actually built on a temple and so and this author's book was banned during Indira Gandhi's regime...how, ridiculous to hide the truth!
24 Nov.
Image de Anonyme
Vijay a écrit :
This email's been going around for ages but who knows what is true - truth is stranger than fiction.

Vijay
23 Nov.

Rétroliens

L'URL de rétrolien de ce billet est :
http://toonfactory.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!FFAE3273A487636E!434.trak
Blogs Web qui font référence à ce billet
  • Aucune